xwyd The Troubling Connection Between Modesty Culture and Rape Culture

Mwbf Kepler Team Marks Five Years in Space
As humanity resets its gaze toward Moon, British aerospace company Rolls-Royce Holdings is continuing its work on developing nuclear power sources for spaceflight and exploration. Today, the company announced funding from the U.K. Space Agency to further research and develop a nuclear reactor thats meant to power a future base on the Moon. The U.K. Space Agency provided Rolls-Royce Holdin stanley cup price gs with 拢2.9 million, which is about $3.5 million USD, according to a press release from the agency. Rolls-Royce elaborated in its release that the funding will be to specifically stanley water jug stanley flask study the fuel that the reactor will use to generate heat, study ways to transfer that heat, and evaluate the technologies needed to transform that heat into electricity. The reactor could be used to power rovers, communications systems, and science experiments on the lunar surface. Rolls-Royce hopes to have the nuclear reactor ready to send to the Moon by 2029. As we prepare to see humans return to the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years, we are backing exciting research like this lunar modular reactor with Rolls-Royce to pioneer new power sources for a lunar base, said George Freeman, minister of state at the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology, in the U.K. Space Agencys press release. Related article: NASA Will Soon Reveal Whos Flying to the Moon for the Artemis 2 Mission Rolls-Royce teased the design of a nuclear reactor for spaceflight on Twitter early last month. Nuclear reactors Wnfh Why a Historian Is Looking Forward to the New Sh艒gun Series
Elizabeth Renstrom for TIM stanley cup EIdeasBy Jeffrey KlugerAugust 3, 2015 4:41 PM EDTJeffrey Kluger is an editor at large at TIME. He covers space, climate, and science. He is the author of 12 books, including Apollo 13, which served as the basis for the 1995 film, and was nominated for an Emmy Award for TIME s series A Year in Space.Let take a moment and praise anti-vaccine parents. Really. They ;re wrong on the science, wrong on the politics, and deeply, morally wrong to deny their own children a simple disease preventive that they themselves likely enjoyed growing up. But like all parents everywhere, they ;re acting on a simple, powerful impulse: to keep their children healthy.That a very noble goal, but it also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don ;t work; nor do one-on-one explan stanley termosai ations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they ;re right.So it extremely good news that researchers at the Univ stanley thermos ersity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign may at last have come up with a way to cut through the misinformation and get the truth across: Don ;t just tell parents to vaccinate their children, show them what happens if they don ;t.In a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy