ktlq Burst of Star Formation Drives Galactic Bubble

Hkrc Well-behaved, Young Galaxy Surprises Astronomers
Ismail Kaplan/Anadolu via Getty ImagesBack in the day, Twitter was a strategic resource for me. It was a very valuable way to interact with my audiences, and I often had fascinating conversations. Readers corrected errors, answered questions, and pointed me to new and interesting things to investigate.But then things changed for Twitter around the end of 2022. You all know the story, so Iapos;m not going to rehash old news. Then, in early 2023, I noticed my engagement with readers had started to crash. The company announced that only tweets from verified accounts would be eligible to be placed in the For You feed, which is where most people see ne [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk]stanley cups uk[/url] w tweets. Also: Have 10 hours IBM will train you in AI fundamentals - for freeSo, in June, I decided to sign up for what was then called Twitter Blue. For $8/month, I not only got the once-coveted Blue Checkm [url=https://www.stanley-mugs.us]stanley thermos mug[/url] ark of Awesomeness, my tweets would also once again be visible to my readers.When I checked back into performance after a month, it was clear that my engagement numbers had recovered. It seemed that Twitter Blue did, indeed, perform.But that was then. This is now. X marks the spot First, Twitter isnapos;t Twitter anymore. Itapos now X. I canapos;t say I like that change. Iapos;m not sure anyone really does. But thatapos what it is. And Twitter Blue isnapos;t Twitter Blue anymore either. Thankfully, itapos also not X Blue, because that would have a bit too much of a pornish ring to it. Not so [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.uk]water bottle stanley[/url] mething you Dqov How to use AI to try on different hairstyles quickly - and cheaply
The Great seal of the St [url=https://www.stanleycup.cz]stanley cup[/url] ate of Maryland鈥攚ith its scandalous words on the banner at the bottomBy Jeffrey KlugerMarch 31, 2014 3:41 PM EDTI used to try to get upset about the motto of the state of Maryland, I really did. A few decades back, when I was a freshman at the University of Maryland and the women movement was still comparatively young, there was something of a kerfuffle about the phrasing at the bottom of the state Great Seal: Fatti Maschii, Parole Femine mdash; words that virtually no Marylander had ever read and so could not be expected to know are Latin for Manly Deeds, Womanly Words.This, of course, sparked the ire of, um, dozens, and there was brief a mini-movement to change the words to Fatti, Fatti, non Parole mdash; or Deeds, Deeds, Not Words. The motto, nonetheless, has endured, not least because it dates back to the family crest of the first Lord Baltimore in 1622, and most reasonable minds agreed it could thus be grandfathered mdash; or great-great-great-great-grandfathered mdash; in. But not so a commentator in the The Washington Post this weekend, who authored a new attack on the very old words under the headline, The Maryland motto is sexist in any language.To which I say: sigh, I guess, provided you really have the ener [url=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk]stanley mugs[/url] gy and bandwidth to give a hoot. And that is the bigger question.As the recent faux scandale about Stephen Colbert 82 [url=https://www.stanley-cups.es]vaso stanley[/url] 17 allegedly racist Tweet showed, not all umbrage is crea